The justices opted not to rule on a Louisiana redistricting case involving racial gerrymandering.

The Democrats on commissioners court and majority of residents who came to the meeting were opposed to the decision.

The contract would hire the Public Interest Legal Foundation to defend the county in the lawsuit. It's the same conservative ...

Those battles include what Common Cause terms a gerrymandering case in North Carolina ... She said, “This case is fundamentally about the majority party in the state legislature, who are currently ...

The U.S. Supreme Court chose not to issue a ruling, for now, on the legality of Louisiana’s congressional map.

Court denied lawsuits without explanation, leaving court watchers and political analysts to wonder why, and what comes next.

The high court did not give a reasoning for its decision to push the ruling until October, but it is expected to hear new ...

In redrawing the map, Louisiana lawmakers said they aimed to comply with the district court’s order while also protecting ...

The final decisions the Supreme Court handed down before adjourning for the summer include a big win for Trump and a lot of 6 ...

The Supreme Court on Friday delayed a decision on the constitutionality of Louisiana’s congressional districts until its next ...

The case tests the balancing act states must strike, protecting the voting power of a racial minority while not ...

I am looking forward to their condemnation of the gerrymandering occurring in West Virginia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Texas and North Carolina, among the most gerrymandered states in the country, as ...