Sales of $10 million-plus paintings have collapsed as high interest rates have flushed speculators out of the market.

In Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith, the justices get another chance to offer their take on the “fair use” doctrine in copyright law. The case involves a set of images Andy ...

These images from Supreme Court documents show a 1981 photo of Prince by Lynn Goldsmith, left; a purple-faced adaptation by pop artist Andy Warhol published by Vanity Fair in 1984, center; and an ...

Andy Warhol in 1968. The Supreme Court will hear a case in the fall over whether he violated copyright law with a portrait of the musician Prince. Barton Silverman/The New York Times ...

An image from Andy Warhol’s Prince Series, circa 1984, which was based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith. The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh; Founding Collection, Contribution The Andy Warhol ...

Andy Warhol wasn’t allowed to use a photographer’s portrait of Prince for a series of pop-art images, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a decision limiting the reach of the fair use ...

A copyright case at the Supreme Court centered on an Andy Warhol silkscreen could have sweeping implications for artists who reference earlier works.

And the magazine commissioned Andy Warhol to make an illustration of Prince for an article it was running about him and to use, as a reference, one of Lynn Goldsmith's black-and-white photos.

In a decision with vast implications, the Supreme Court ruled that Andy Warhol's images of Prince violated the original photographer's copyright.

Andy Warhol wasn’t allowed to use a photographer’s portrait of Prince for a series of pop-art images, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a decision limiting the reach of the fair use ...

Wednesday’s argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith wandered widely, as the justices considered whether a famous set of images that Andy Warhol based on a 1981 photograph ...