Flock cameras, collecting license plates and tracking movements over time, may fall into a constitutional gray zone.

Kagan insists that the Fourth Amendment cannot be defeated by slicing invasions of privacy into pieces small enough to appear ...

Your cellphone continuously creates a durable and revealing digital trail that law enforcement can obtain with a warrant.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie v. United States extends Fourth Amendment protection to geofence location data ...

These libertarians with their prattling on about freedom and rights. They can be so tiresome. Please stop with the high dudgeon! Here’s an example of one such “freedom” person writing about open-ended ...

Carter, a Fourth Amendment seizure case. The petition arrives on the heels of the court’s summary reversal in District of Columbia v. R.W., another Fourth Amendment seizure case from the capital. But ...

Geofence warrants compel tech companies like Google to provide information about electronic devices that are present in a ...

The Fourth Amendment protects Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures, including digital data. Government agencies like ICE and the Department of Homeland Security are reportedly using ...

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a far-reaching decision on the constitutionality of a law enforcement tool that allows police to access the location histories of millions of cell phone users. In a ...

Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. The Supreme Court on Monday grappled in Chatrie v. United Stateswith a Virginia man’s challenge to the use of a “geofence ...

The Supreme Court ruled that police conduct a Fourth Amendment search when they obtain a person’s detailed cellphone location ...

When can law enforcement officers enter a home without a warrant to address an emergency situation? This question has divided courts of years. In Case v. Montana, 607 U.S. ___ (2026), the Supreme ...