Amid geopolitical turmoil, the top court reaffirmed states’ legal duty to cut emissions. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read ...

The Court’s advisory opinion affirms that inadequate action on climate change may violate international law. Its findings could shape the contours of debate at COP30.

A profound thread runs through the judgment and the separate opinion of one of the judges: that biodiversity is not merely a ...

Trump's attack on climate policies go against the top court's opinion, which could be used by lawyers to fight back ...

After the Paris Agreement came into effect in 2016, it was understood that the 1997 Kyoto Protocol had lost its legal relevance. However, the ICJ has now said that the treaty remains valid, and countr ...

The ICJ’s advisory opinion spells out states’ duties on climate, opening doors for lawsuits and stronger climate action. View ...

This obligation arises from human rights, maritime and the customary international law, as well as the Paris Agreement and ...

The United States said on Thursday that it was placing sanctions of officials in the Palestinian Authority and Palestine ...

ICJ advisory opinion on climate obligations reaffirms global South's perspective, raises questions on Paris Agreement ...

In a landmark ruling, the International Court of Justice declared that failure to act on climate change can be an ...

The top United Nations court will on Wednesday hand down a landmark global legal blueprint for tackling climate change that ...

Independently of the ECU’s involvement, BBC News added the following correction: An earlier version of this post contained the sentence “She says Israel must desist from killing, injuring, destroying ...