The Supreme Court declined to hear a debate over whether government employees can be fired for controversial social media ...

Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, known formally as 42 U.S.C. §1983, is a federal law that allows for the suing ...

Justice Thomas has said the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Due Process clause created a "tool for obstruction." ...

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas filed a dissent to the Court's order to postpone a case pertaining to redistricting in ...

Here are some takeaways from the Supreme Court’s term: That’s where the court deals with cases that are still in their early ...

The Supreme Court’s decision will have implications for more than a dozen states that require age verification to view adult ...

This is a health care catastrophe. But Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in the case, Medina v. Planned Parenthood ...

Justice Thomas panned “self-described experts” as “irrelevant,” criticized the term “gender-affirming care,” and was ...

Pornhub disabled its website in Texas in response to the law, which requires adult websites to verify users’ ages.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s shunning of “experts” defending gender-affirming care is delighting conservatives in their assault on liberal influence in academics and medicine, a mission ...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday that states with laws requiring age verification for porn sites is constitutional. The case, known as Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (Ken Paxton is the Attorney ...

Friday's decision stems from President Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship, but the Supreme Court ...